2002 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Impala (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 190 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Impala (278 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Impala | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | CU-X |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 80 L |