2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 17 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (277 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 1969 Dodge Challenger
Make Chevrolet Dodge
Model Monte Carlo Challenger
Year Released 2002 1969
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3353 cc 5562 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 180 HP 235 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 277 Nm 421 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1508 kg 1525 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 75 L