2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,353 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 188 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Monte Carlo | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3353 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1508 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2680 mm |