2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2005 Smart Coupe is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,353 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 778 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (277 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Coupe |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3353 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 277 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1508 kg | 730 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 33 L |
