2002 Chevrolet Prizm vs. 1954 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Prizm is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati A6G (168 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Prizm. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Prizm. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Prizm weights approximately 340 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G.
Because 1954 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Prizm, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Prizm | 1954 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Prizm | A6G |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2320 mm |