2002 Chevrolet Relsamo vs. 1962 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Relsamo | 1962 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Relsamo | MK X |
Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |