2002 Chevrolet Relsamo vs. 1963 Mini MK I
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Relsamo | 1963 Mini MK I | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Relsamo | MK I |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |