2002 Chevrolet Relsamo vs. 2003 Ford 427
To start off, 2003 Ford 427 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo would be higher. At 6,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Ford 427 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford 427 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford 427. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford 427 has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford 427 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo | 2003 Ford 427 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Relsamo | 427 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 6997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 582 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
