2002 Chevrolet Relsamo vs. 2004 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2500 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mazda B2500 has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mazda B2500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Relsamo | 2004 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Relsamo | B2500 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |