2002 Chevrolet Relsamo vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Relsamo | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Relsamo | C3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |