2002 Chevrolet Relsamo vs. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo
To start off, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo would be higher. At 4,691 cc, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo | 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
| Model | Relsamo | Gran Turismo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4691 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
