2002 Chevrolet Relsamo vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Relsamo | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Relsamo | XC60 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 321 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |