2002 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet S-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet S-10. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet S-10.
Because 2002 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Volvo 140. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet S-10 (190 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet S-10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet S-10 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | S-10 | 140 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2620 mm |
