2002 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet S-10. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet S-10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 447 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet S-10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet S-10. (190 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet S-10.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet S-10 | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
| Model | S-10 | Mountaineer |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1917 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2900 mm |
