2002 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1959 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1959 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1959 Simca Aronde. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1310 kg more than 1959 Simca Aronde. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1959 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Chevrolet | Simca |
Model | Tahoe | Aronde |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2450 mm |