2002 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Tahoe | Celica |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4807 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2640 mm |