2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1950 Rover P4
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,103 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1950 Rover P4. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1950 Rover P4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Rover P4 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1950 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1950 Rover P4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Tracker | P4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2103 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |