2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCM
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 1,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1953 Maserati A6GCM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Tracker | A6GCM |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2290 mm |