2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1953 Skoda 1200
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1953 Skoda 1200. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1953 Skoda 1200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Skoda 1200. (74 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1953 Skoda 1200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Tracker | 1200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2690 mm |