2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1957 Skoda 440
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Skoda 440. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Skoda 440 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1957 Skoda 440. (38 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1957 Skoda 440.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Skoda 440. (74 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Skoda 440.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1957 Skoda 440 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | Tracker | 440 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1089 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |
