2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1957 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Crown. (49 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Crown.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Toyota Crown. (108 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1957 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Tracker | Crown |
Year Released | 2002 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2540 mm |