2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1958 Seat 600
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1958 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1958 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1958 Seat 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Tracker | 600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2010 mm |