2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1959 Morgan 4
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1959 Morgan 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 Morgan 4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Morgan 4. (73 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1959 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Morgan |
| Model | Tracker | 4 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 73 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2450 mm |
