2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (84 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Tracker | Herald |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2320 mm |
