2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1964 Steyr 500
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Steyr 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Steyr 500 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1964 Steyr 500. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1964 Steyr 500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Steyr 500. (32 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Steyr 500.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1964 Steyr 500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Steyr |
Model | Tracker | 500 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 489 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1850 mm |