2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1966 Willys-Overland Interlagos
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Willys-Overland Interlagos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Willys-Overland Interlagos would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1966 Willys-Overland Interlagos. (52 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1966 Willys-Overland Interlagos.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Willys-Overland Interlagos. (76 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Willys-Overland Interlagos.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1966 Willys-Overland Interlagos | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Willys-Overland |
| Model | Tracker | Interlagos |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 76 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2110 mm |
