2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1968 Fiat 600
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Fiat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Fiat 600 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1968 Fiat 600. (23 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1968 Fiat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Fiat 600. (45 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Fiat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1968 Fiat 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
| Model | Tracker | 600 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 23 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2010 mm |
