2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Ford Torino
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Torino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Torino would be higher. At 4,095 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Torino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1972 Ford Torino. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Torino.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Torino (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Torino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Ford Torino | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Torino |
Year Released | 2002 | 1972 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4095 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3000 mm |