2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1973 Seat 127
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Seat 127 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1973 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1973 Seat 127.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Seat 127. (64 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1973 Seat 127 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Tracker | 127 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 64 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2230 mm |