2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1975 Skoda 110 L
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Skoda 110 L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Skoda 110 L would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1975 Skoda 110 L. (43 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1975 Skoda 110 L.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Skoda 110 L. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Skoda 110 L.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1975 Skoda 110 L | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Tracker | 110 L |
Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |