2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1977 Kia Brisa
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1977 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1977 Kia Brisa.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Kia Brisa. (69 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Kia Brisa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1977 Kia Brisa | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
| Model | Tracker | Brisa |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 69 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2270 mm |
