2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis (129 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis (303 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Tracker 1978 Mercury Grand Marquis
Make Chevrolet Mercury
Model Tracker Grand Marquis
Year Released 2002 1978
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 4942 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 97 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 303 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 5400 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2910 mm