2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1978 Skoda L
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1978 Skoda L | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | Tracker | L |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |
