2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Tracker | XJR |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2870 mm |
