2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1983 Volkswagen Golf

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1983 Volkswagen Golf. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1983 Volkswagen Golf.

Because 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volkswagen Golf. (96 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volkswagen Golf.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Tracker 1983 Volkswagen Golf
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Tracker Golf
Year Released 2002 1983
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1272 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 53 HP
Torque 139 Nm 96 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3300 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2480 mm