2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1986 Dodge Omni

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Omni would be higher. Both 2002 Chevrolet Tracker and 1986 Dodge Omni are equipped with a 1,590 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Omni. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Omni.

Because 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Dodge Omni. (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Dodge Omni.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Tracker 1986 Dodge Omni
Make Chevrolet Dodge
Model Tracker Omni
Year Released 2002 1986
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 62 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 117 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4190 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2530 mm