2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1986 Ferrari Testarossa
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ferrari Testarossa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ferrari Testarossa would be higher. At 4,941 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Ferrari Testarossa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ferrari Testarossa (390 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ferrari Testarossa should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ferrari Testarossa (475 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1986 Ferrari Testarossa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 1986 Ferrari Testarossa | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
| Model | Tracker | Testarossa |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4941 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |
