2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1996 Proton 400

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400.

Because 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Tracker 1996 Proton 400
Make Chevrolet Proton
Model Tracker 400
Year Released 2002 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1299 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 108 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4280 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2510 mm