2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Mahindra Commander
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mahindra Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mahindra Commander would be higher. At 2,112 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Commander. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Commander.
Because 2000 Mahindra Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra Commander. (123 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Mahindra Commander | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mahindra |
Model | Tracker | Commander |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2112 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2690 mm |