2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Infiniti FX
To start off, 2004 Infiniti FX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,494 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Infiniti FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Infiniti FX (315 HP) has 218 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Infiniti FX should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Infiniti FX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Infiniti FX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Infiniti FX (446 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 Infiniti FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Infiniti FX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Infiniti |
| Model | Tracker | FX |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 315 HP |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 446 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2860 mm |
