2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,702 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (235 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (407 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Tracker | Ram |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4702 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 4080 mm |