2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
| Model | Tracker | K2700 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2390 mm |
