2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Tracker | Armada |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3140 mm |
