2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Honda Accord

To start off, 2006 Honda Accord is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Accord (166 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda Accord (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Tracker 2006 Honda Accord
Make Chevrolet Honda
Model Tracker Accord
Year Released 2002 2006
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 2358 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 166 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 217 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4860 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2750 mm