2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2006 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2006 Suzuki SX4 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki SX4 (184 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2006 Suzuki SX4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 2006 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Tracker | SX4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 184 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |