2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,197 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu KB (190 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
Model | Tracker | KB |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2197 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3030 mm |