2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 BMW X1
To start off, 2012 BMW X1 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW X1 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 BMW X1 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 BMW X1 has automatic transmission and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW X1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 BMW X1 | |
Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
Model | Tracker | X1 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4454 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1798 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1545 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2760 mm |