2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport vs. 1961 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport (184 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (115 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport should accelerate faster than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport weights approximately 460 kg more than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport (285 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (188 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport | 1961 Fiat Grand Break | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Trans Sport | Grand Break |
Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 2279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2660 mm |