2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (238 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport. (184 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (410 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport. (285 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet Trans Sport | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Trans Sport | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 238 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 410 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2916 mm |