2002 Chrysler 300 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2002 Chrysler 300 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler 300 (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 353 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler 300 (346 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler 300 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | 300 | Renown |
Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 346 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1633 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2750 mm |